Saturday, October 25, 2014

Halfway to my goal; Making excellent progress but still fearing failure

First I will trumpet the good news. I have lost 52 pounds since I started this quest.  My blood sugar readings are excellent, and my daily intake of insulin and my daily dose of cholesterol medication been cut in half. I am now wearing the same size clothes I wore when I retired from the Air Force ten years ago (although to be fair, I was 20 pounds overweight by Air Force standards when I retired). All of this is extremely good news.  I am just about halfway to my goal of 173 pounds, and I am seeing the positive health impacts as well as a positive rise in my own self-image.

The key to my success has been religiously recording every calorie I consume and limiting my daily intake to between 1400 and 1700 calories. To keep under that calorie limit, I have radically overhauled my diet.  My new diet has no potato chips, no French fries, very few potatoes, and very little white rice. When I do eat high calorie food, I eat small portions. For example, I order the smallest burger at a restaurant, and if it is portion is still too large (based on my calorie goal for the day), I will take a portion home and use it for lunch or dinner the next day.   To keep me on track, I have found the space in my calorie budget for the occasional treat like a small scoop of ice cream, a piece of pizza, and a beer or two at the ball park. Additionally, I have learned to recognize that I am not going to go into a diabetic coma if I don’t immediately much on something the first time I feel the slightest hunger pang.(This is a true, but very unrealistic fear I once had).  To keep me on the straight and narrow, I also make sure I have plenty of fruit and other healthy snacks such as nuts, raw vegetables, and canned sardines to stave off any linger hunger pangs between meals. (Yes, sardines are a common light lunch for me on this diet). I limit my breakfast to 300 calories or less. My goal with breakfast is too eat enough to take away any immediate hunger pangs, but to force my body to begin the fat burning as early each day as possible. (Of course, that may be unscientific, but it does show how my thinking works).

Overall, I have nothing but positives to report. However, I still fear that I will eventually slip back into my old ways. While I have managed to retool my eating habits over the past 90 days, I have to be realistic and recognize that those 90 days stand counter to the 52 years of contrary habits that went before. In 2007 I weighed 220 pounds for about a week.  However, I eventually let the bad habits slip back in, and my weight rebounded to something close to 280 pounds.  Therefore, I am keenly aware of the real danger that is could all be an ephemeral accomplishment.  I have no way of knowing what the future will bring. However, I am convinced part of my long term success is dependent on me harnessing these fears and using them to reinvigorate my resolve if and when I backslide into old habits.

Wish me luck, I will keep you posted.

Friday, August 15, 2014

A 30-day Update on My Quest for Better Health

It has been 30 days since I decided to see if I could lose weight through a concerted effort using diet and exercise. So far, the results have been all positive. I have lost a little over 20 pounds in the four weeks, and I have been losing the weight at a constant 5 pounds a week.  I would attribute almost all of this to decreased meal portion sizes and a religious devotion to recording everything that passes across my lips. 

I am obsessed with measuring everything to get as accurate of an estimate of my calories intake as possible.  I weigh all of the food that I prepare, and I take the time to enter the nutrient information from food packaging into my on-line dieting journal.

As I said, smaller portion sizes seem to be the big difference for me.   Observing that I can be satisfied with a few ounces of meat with a meal has been a real revelation. Before, I would easily consume four times more meat with a meal. I do not miss the larger portions.  I had been worried that, with smaller portion sizes, I would not feel fully satisfied.  That has not been the case.  However, I do tend to eat large portions of steamed vegetables with most meals, so there has been little opportunity to leave the table with an empty stomach.  

I had begun with a goal of eating no more than 2,000 calories a day, but I have found that I can get by on an average of 1,500 calories without feeling ravenously hungry.  I have noted that, if I do occasionally feel a mild hunger pang, it will often go away without me quenching it with food.  Also, I make sure that, if I do have a snack, it is something with a good nutrient content such as fruit or raw vegetables.  In fact, the hardest part of keeping to the diet is making sure I have plenty of healthy food options on hand.  I find I need to make a fruit and vegetable run to the grocery store almost every other day.

Another significant change is that I do not eat out as much as I had been.  Laura and I often dined out as many as five nights a week, both because we didn't feel like cooking or as a form of entertainment.  However, I have found that the fact that I can’t accurately gauge my caloric intake has inhibited me from dining out as frequently. Instead, I have gone back to cooking more often (which I love anyhow) so that I have maximum control of my diet.  We have eaten out once or twice since I in the past 30 days, but we have been careful to consider what we are likely to order and the caloric content before we settle on a restaurant.  If I am on the road for work, I will grab a hamburger (the smallest size) and an unsweetened ice tea for lunch. I do not order fries, not because of the calories per se, but because I have found that French fries are a source of sugar spikes which isn't good for a diabetic. 

Of course, I do not live a life of Spartan deprivation. For the past two Sundays I have attended Orioles games, so I made a point to allow space in my daily calorie budget for a beer and Italian sausage.  That way, I don’t feel deprived, while at the same time I do feel satisfaction with my healthy choices and self-control. Mostly, I have had fruit for desert or an evening snack, but last night, I had an ice cream sandwich after dinner.  No matter what eat, I make sure I monitor my overall calories, and keep an eye on the mix of nutrients throughout the week.  

One surprise is that I really have not been hitting the gym as I had planned.  The only change in my exercise regime is that I have tried to find a way to put a little extra walking on my weekly agenda. For example, when I went to the ballpark, I made a point of parking a significant distance from the stadium so I could walk to and from the stadium. Last Sunday, I parked more than 1.5 miles from the stadium on the other side of the inner harbor.  I also have made a point to take our dog on longer walks in the evening a few nights a week.

Overall, things are looking good as I am well on my way to my goal of losing 100 pounds.  One resource I have found to be quite helpful is the book: Dr Arthur Apolinario’s The Absolute Last Weight Loss, Diet, and Exercise Book You Will Ever Need to Read.  So far, the advice presented in that book has been spot on.   I also would like to thank all those who have been encouraging me on Facebook and as a result of this blog. That has helped me keep my focus and motivation.  Keep watching my blog for future updates. 

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

A challenge: Losing weight to avoid the surgeon's knife

The question before us is: can a 53 years old, morbidly obese man lose enough weight to positively impact his health and avoid gastric bypass surgery?  I intend to use this blog to publicly explore that question.  I am a type two diabetic with a family history of heart disease, diabetes, and obesity.  Can I make the changes in my diet and lifestyle that will undo years of bad habits and faulty thinking, or must I resign myself to radical surgery that will artificially limit the amount of food I can ingest?

Perhaps a little background is in order.  I am 5 foot 10 inches tall and weighed 273.5 pounds as my last doctor's visit. This is more than 100 pounds over my ideal weight and gives me a Body Mass Index of 40, well beyond what is considered healthy.  Since I was diagnosed with diabetes more than four years ago, I have been able to manage my diabetes with a bunch of pills every day, and by injecting slow acting insulin before bed each night. While this regime has kept my diabetes under control, the amount of insulin I need to take each night has been slowly increasing. This is bad sign, as it indicates I am becoming more resistant to insulin. Additionally, it seems to be much harder to lose the weight than it once was. I have tried moderately cutting back my daily calories and getting regular exercise. In the past, this would be enough for me to drop some pounds.  Now, my weight doesn't seem to want to drop off. My doctor said this is probably a result of the insulin. How ironic, the medicine that is controlling my illness is slowing my ability to reverse it.  Given my apparent increasing insulin resistance, both my family doctor and my endocrinologist have recommended that I consider bariatric surgery, specifically a gastric bypass.

So, with my physician's referral in hand, I sat through the mandatory information session sponsored by my hospital's bariatric surgery center.  The presentation was very informative. The surgeon outlined the six month screening process of supervised dieting, exercise, and psychological evaluations that are required before they would consider conducting the surgery.  She described the various surgical options such as the lab band or sleeve gastronomy, but strongly recommended that I undergo a complete gastric bypass. The thinking is that the other forms of bariatric surgery are not nearly as efficacious in addressing chronic diabetes.  Essentially, they would surgically reroute my digestive system, making a much smaller stomach and by-passing much of my intestines, hence the name.

The orientation seminar asserted surgery has a significant chance of completely reversing my diabetes. Essentially, the surgery limits how much you can eat at one time. According to the seminar, I could expect to lose (and keep off) about 70% of my excess weight after a gastric bypass.  However, this surgery is not without its risks and it is a very radical solution to the problem. The orientation did not try to undersell the significant risks from surgery. Instead, they pointed out that the risks from surgery may be warranted by significantly lowering of the risk of death due to complications from chronic diabetes.

At the end of the information session, a former patient talked of her experience with the bariatric procedure. The patient explained how she had been morbidly obese since she was 14. She said she had struggled with type-two diabetes for her entire adult life.  When her diabetes began to worsen as she turned 30, she decided to get the gastric bypass her doctor had been recommending.  Now, four years after the surgery, she obviously was much thinner and healthier than the woman in the "before" pictures.  She said her diabetes was gone and that she was very satisfied with her new post-operative diet. She said her surgically altered stomach makes it very unpleasant for her to eat more than a small portion of anything at any one meal. She also said she becomes physically ill if she eats anything with too high of a sugar content such as cake frosting or ice cream. The surgery has created a negative feedback loop that triggers discomfort, nausea, and cramping if she resorts to unhealthy eating habits.  She said the combination of the feeling of satisfaction along with the post-surgery aversion to sweet foods has enabled her to maintain her diet in an effortless fashion. She said that this was unlike all the other diet and exercise programs she tried and failed at.

Following the orientation session, I completed the required forms and submitted the paperwork to the hospital Bariatric Center to enroll myself in the pre-surgery counselling program.  Because morbid obesity with chronic diabetes is such a common diagnosis, the bariatric center may take up to a month to fit me into the schedule for the next step, a mandatory supervised diet and exercise program.

However, I have decided not to wait to begin the supervised diet.  Instead, I have begun a self-initiated diet in which I will try to limit myself to no more than 1800 calories per day.  This is a probably half of my normal calorie intake, and is much less than my "typical weight-loss diet mode" calorie limit of 2500 calories. However, 1800 calories is 300 calories more than the total calories I will be expected to consume after the bariatric surgery.  Because the total daily calorie count for the diet is relatively low, I will be logging all the foods I eat using a program that helps me also track my nutrient levels. Anyone who is interested in my diet or progress on my weight loss goal can see it at  Mike Summers' Public Diet and Activity Log. In addition, I intend to use this blog to narrate my journey to lose this weight, or if I fail that, with my experience with the surgery.

So, the question at the moment is can I maintain such a radical diet to lose the weight and thus avoid having the surgery?  I don't know, but my initial results from the diet have been surprisingly good.  I began the 1800 calorie a day diet on 17 July when I weighed 273 pounds.  As of yesterday, I had easily remained below the daily calorie limit, and I had lost 12 pounds. So, I am now down to 261 pounds. Another noticeable impact from the diet is that I have seen a significant decrease in the amount of insulin I take each night. This is probably not related to my modest weight loss to date. Instead, it is probably related to the significant drop carbohydrates in my diet as cutting empty carb calories is how I have stayed below my daily calorie limit.   Of course, it is easy to keep on the diet for a few weeks.  The real test will be if I can sustain a true change in my eating habits over the long haul.  Wish me luck, and check back here again from time to time to see my progress.  

Monday, January 13, 2014

“High Hopes” for new Springsteen Record Rewarded

Bruce Springsteen’s new album, High Hopes, is a solid collection that again confirms Bruce’s talent. Although this record consists of several older, previously unreleased songs, two rerecorded older songs, and two covers of other people’s songs, it does not sound like a grab bag of outtakes. Instead, it is a coherent record that stands up to comparison with his best works.  And, because some of the basic tracks were initially recorded some time ago, we are treated to two songs that include the late Clarence Clemons' saxophone work.

High Hopes strength is its varied arrangements. These arrangements provide just enough ornamentation to keep the songs from sounding stale.  Yet, the production also shows restraint. This restraint prevents the songs from being buried under a blanket of production effects.  The opening title track ‘High Hopes’ provides a prime example. This track begins with a polyrhythm that is uncharacteristic of a Springsteen composition. This rhythm propels the song and it, along with the track’s horns, keeps this song sounding fresh. Yet, the song retains a traditional Springsteen-esqe core that would be at home on the 1980’s Tunnel of Love.

Throughout his history, Bruce Springsteen has had the services of two outstanding guitarists, Nils Lofgren and Steven Van Zandt, to compliment his own guitar prowess. This record features those East Street Band regulars along with the ex-Rage against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello. Tom Morello is featured on all but one of the album’s tracks. Morello’s contributions add an additional texture to the two new versions of previously released tracks, American Skin (41 Shots) and The Ghost of Tom Joad.  The latter song is a studio recording of the arrangement previously available only on the live EP, “Magic Tour Highlights”. The transformation of the originally acoustic Tom Joad by Springsteen and Morello is akin to the transformation by Hendrix of Dylan’s All along the Watchtower.  This new arrangement powerfully expresses the anger, frustration and longing for justice that lies at the heart of this song. It is the highlight of the record.

If you are Bruce Springsteen fan, you should give High Hopes a listen.  You will not be disappointed.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

My 2013 Best and Worst Film List

Laura and I go to the movies a lot. On average, in 2013, we went to the movies five times each month. Fortunately, there were a lot of decent films this year; films that didn't make me regret spending my money on the ticket. Most films I saw this year didn't make either the best or worst list. They were ok, but I could have just as happily waited to see them when they rotate to cable.

The list of recommendations are those films that I thought were the best and that you should seek out if you haven't seen them yet. The list could be incomplete as I haven't seen some films still in wide release such as Anchorman 2, or Inside Llewyn Davis yet.

The films on my worst list are films I regretted spending my money on.  Stay away from them.

The films on both lists are in the order of their release, and are not ranked against each other. However, the films on my best list tended to get better towards the end of the year. December was a particularly good month, and  American Hustle, released in late December, was my favorite film of the year.

My 2013 Recommendations 

42

  • The Jackie Robinson biopic, good acting, good story, it left me with a good feeling

Star Trek  into the Darkness

  • The latest Star Trek Reboot does not disappoint. If you liked the original series, you will be pleased with the parallels with the original, but you will be surprised by the twists. 

This is the End

  • Seth Rogen apocalypse comedy that had to have been written when he was stoned. Still it is funny if you like scatological humor. 

The Way Way Back

  • Steve Carell plays a real ass-hole in this comedy/drama but is easy to see why this film won awards at Sundance. 

Fruitvale Station

  • Not a feel good picture, but definitely puts you right in the heart and mind of the characters

The Butler

  • I expected this to be a black Forest Gump for some reason based on the trailers. However, it turns out to be a good, solid film about how the choices people made in the black community during the struggle to win civil rights impacted one family.

Enough Said

  • James Gandolfini and Julia Louis-Dreyfus had real chemistry in this comedy that almost no one saw

Killing Them Softly

  • A very faithful (almost word for word) adaption of the novel Cogan’s Trade. Brad Pitt, Ray Liotta and James Gandolfini are excellent in this film that absolutely doesn’t follow the standard underworld hit man cookie cutter plot.  Some people were disappointed with the ending, but it is faithful to the novel.

Don Jon

  • As film about a Guido addicted to Porn, I was surprised I liked it. But, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Scarlett Johansson, Julianne Moore and Toni Danza really were good in this romantic comedy that does not follow the formulaic rom-com plot.

Gravity 

  • Sandra Bullock is excellent in this non-stop action drama that is best seen in 3D

Captain Philips

  • Tom Hanks won me over again in a film that I did not think I was going to like going into it.

12 Years a Slave

  • A true story, it is brutal but honest look at slavery.  Definitely not a feel good story, but it was not as depressing as Fruitvale Station.  Worth your time though.

Dallas Buyers Club

  • Matthew McConaughey and Jered Leto are fantastic in this film. The plot is original, and  the unlikable characters are interesting.

American Hustle

  • The Best film of the year, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Jennifer Lawrence, and Bradley Cooper make you care about the characters in this funny comedy/drama about the Abscam scandle in the 1970s.

The Wolf of Wall Street

  • The film is too long, and it is morally ambiguous but the excellent performance by Leonardo DiCaprio and scene stealing performance by Jonah Hill redeems this film.  Martin Scorsese captures the essence of the sleaze that was Jordan Belfort.

The Worst Films of 2013 (I want my money back)

Broken City

  • Mark Wahlberg and Russell Crowe let me down with this stinker in which the bad acting is matched by the bad plot

World War Z

  • Even Brad Pitt could not save this lousy plot that shares nothing in common with the excellent book except for the title.  Even the zombies are wrong.

Stand Up Guys

  • I had high hopes for an Al Pacino, Christopher Walken, Alan Arkin gangster flick, but the plot completely let me down

A Good Day to Die Hard

  • A noisy excuse for explosions and car chases, an asinine plot and bad acting. Nothing about this film was good. Bruce Willis must have needed the money

The Great Gatsby

  • This film could have been great, but the soundtrack, editing, and desire to make a “spectacle” instead of telling the story ultimately bog the film down. Tobey Maguire spend most of the movie looking dumbfounded. Leonardo DiCaprio plays a decent Gatsby, but his screen charisma just couldn’t save this one.

White House Down

  • Stupid and predictable with bad acting to boot.

Killing Season

  • The first in a string of bad Robert De Niro films.  John Travolta also stinks in this one. His acting is as bad as his facial hair (Amish Beard).

The Family

  • The second Robert De Niro film that sucked. Bad plot and poor performances killed this one for me.  Michelle Pfeiffer didn’t fare much better either.

Thor: The Dark World

  • It is a comic book film, so I don’t expect much. But this stinker could not even hit my very low bar. Laura is not going to forgive me for dragging her to this bomb. 

Last Vegas

  • I got free tickets for this comedy so I was predisposed to like it. However, the plot was weak and predictable, the characters were one dimensional and the jokes just weren’t funny.   Not a single one.